5 March 2006
Courtyard, Ca d'Oro
All photographs ©2005 J.Crawford
Support for Carfree.comHosting costs are paid up through May 2006, thanks to two recent anonymous donations. Please see the Support Page if you can consider making a contribution.
Carfree Design ManualI am down to the last three chapters, which are proving more difficult than I had anticipated. We are attempting to conduct a field test of the processes I am proposing. Prague is the most likely site of this test, which would be conducted in conjunction with the WCN meeting in Tabor in late May (see below).
Carfree Cities AvailabilityBoth the paperback and hardcover editions of Carfree Cities are widely available. For details, see the Ordering Information page.
ThanksThanks to the many stringers who have forwarded stories to Carfree Times. I've stopped naming people for fear of slighting someone by overlooking a name.
World Carfree Network
New Carbusters SiteThe Internet site of WCN's Carbusters Magazine has a new look and more on-line content.
Training Seminar and General Meeting in Tabor, CZWCN will hold a week-long skill-training and project development meeting in Tabor, Czech Republic, between May 22 and 26, including a project development day on May 25. WCN's Annual General Meeting will be held on May 26. Please register as soon as possible using the on-line form.
Towards Carfree Cities VIOrganizing of TCFC VI is running late due to personnel changes at the foundation hosting the conference. WCN still hopes to see the conference held in Bogotá, Colombia, 19-23 September. Further details in the next issue. Information at WCN's conference page.
Towards Carfree Cities VIIThe seventh conference in the series will be held in Istanbul in 2007. Final dates will be announced soon. Information at WCN's conference page.
World Carfree News in SpanishWCN's free monthly e-bulletin, World Carfree News, is now also in Spanish, in addition to English, French, German and Czech versions, thanks to the hard work of volunteers. To receive the bulletin, just sign up.
Carfree UK to Be LaunchedA group of transport and planning professionals, researchers and campaigners have decided to establish Carfree UK. As a member of WCN, it will advance the agenda of larger, high quality carfree areas in the UK. The group’s founders believe there is great interest and potential for success. For more information or to offer help, download this RTF document.
Hidden Green in VeniceScattered throughout this issue are photographs of "hidden" greenery in Venice. I became interested in "Venetian green" while writing Carfree Design Manual, and when I was in Venice this past October I made a point of shooting practically anything green. The photographs included here are a reasonably representative sample of the greenery that is to be found in Venice.
The lead photograph in this issue shows the small private interior courtyard in the Ca d'Oro palace. The photograph above is of the Giardini ex Reali, in the very shadow of San Marco but probably missed by many tourists. This small park is used intensively and regularly manicured. These two spaces are the alpha and omega of the greenery in this issue. (The Parco delle Rimembanze in eastern Venice is much larger than the Giardini but in no sense "hidden" and so not included here.)
My vision of the city had been one that was nearly devoid of greenery. Once I started looking for it, however, I realized that plants abound in Venice. Most are tended with great care. They serve to blunt what would otherwise be the hard edges of brick and stone. They are critical to the livability of the city. And I say this being no gardener by inclination or experience. All of the photographs are from the main islands of Venice.
Another Czech MartyrSomeone once told me that nearly all Czech heroes are martyrs. Add one more to the list. On 12 January 2006, Jan Bouchal, age 30, Director of the Prague cycling advocacy group Ozivení and coordinator of the Auto*Mat project, died of injuries sustained when he was hit by a car while cycling a few days before.
Bouchal advocated for reduced car use and increased cycling, walking, and public transport. He supported Prague's Critical Mass and collaborated with World Carfree Network on carfree days. His death is a serious loss for a city in the grip of rampant motorization. We offer our condolences to his family.
World Carfree News
Carfree New York IslandGovernors Island, situated just off the southern tip of Manhattan, has been largely vacant since the Coast Guard moved out ten years ago. The 172 acre (70 hectare) island happens to be just a bit larger than the Reference District, and the terms of the sale by the federal government to a state-city coalition expressly forbid private cars. Unfortunately, the terms also forbid any permanent residential development.
It appears that the island will be redeveloped as a tourist destination, although its isolation from the population centers of New York City make this use dubious, particularly given that the financial district, which comprises southern Manhattan, is deserted evenings and weekends. Still, it's fascinating that the federal government even thought of imposing a carfree covenant on the sale. It will be interesting to see what comes of this. People are talking about a billion-dollar project, it's going to be carfree, and it's as big as the Reference District.
"New York eyes island for urban oasis"
Cars Bad for YouTransportation Alternatives (TA) in New York published a study showing that people who live on streets with heavy traffic go out less often and have fewer friends than those living on quieter streets. This is not really news - Donald Appleyard reached the same conclusions after a careful study published as Livable Streets in 1981. TA's study is called "Livable Streets: A New Vision for New York." It takes aim at New York's "auto-centric" street grid and challenges city planners to rethink how people use the city, and to what end.
TA surveyed 450 residents in various New York neighborhoods in an effort to quantify the decline in quality of life caused by traffic. TA found that car horns and engine exhaust are not conducive to hanging around on the street, making idle conversation. Pedestrians outnumber car-commuters in Manhattan by more than seven to one, yet streets are principally devoted to motor vehicles. (In mid-town Manhattan, this figure must surely be much higher.)
"Other cities have begun to measure the performance of their streets in terms of walkability or bike-ability," said Paul Steely White, executive director of TA. "Here in New York, we're still measuring by how many potholes we've filled or the 'vehicular level of service.'" The study also found that treating streets as "car corridors" is strangling New York's economy and impairing the quality of life.
The preliminary findings about how traffic affects social relations and children's ability to play were presented on 15 February 2006 at the Municipal Arts Society as part of a two-month exhibition on New York's "love affair with the auto." (Actually, everyone in New York knows that most cars in Manhattan are from New Jersey.) The exhibit runs through 31 March and is "the opening salvo in the New York City Renaissance Campaign," according to the Village Voice article. A coalition of community groups, public officials, and businessmen are pushing to restrict cars and level the playing field for cyclists and pedestrians.
The Voice noted that the crowd at the opening gala the week before had "the makings of a diverse movement to reclaim the streets." There's talk of a carfree central park and congestion charging, although Mayor Bloomberg claims it couldn't work in New York. (Why not? All those Jersey drivers?)
The Voice said, "Regardless of how they do it, curbing traffic in New York will require a real revolution in mass transit, and that's hard to fathom in a city that can't figure out how to get the trains to run on time, and where the long-awaited Second Avenue Subway remains stalled in the planning phase."
The Voice text carries the note "Posted in Citystate," whatever that may mean.
"Is City Traffic Killing Your Love Life?"
Money for Amsterdam CyclistsOver the next five years, Amsterdam will spend €100 million to help cyclists and prevent a chaotic increase in motorized traffic. The "Meerjarenbeleidsplan Fiets 2006-2010" called for the expenditures. The objective is to achieve 37% of all intra-city movements by bike. The plan expresses a significant increase in the perceived importance of cycling and a large commitment compared to recent years. Even without massive expenditures, the picture has improved in the past 20 years, with the number of serious injuries among cyclists declining by 35% at the same time that bike usage increased by 20%.
Most of the money will be spent to improve the principal cycling network, which is still comparatively thin in the inner city. (I refused to bike in central Amsterdam due to the danger, but I did often bike out of the city and enjoyed the excellent bike paths.) The length of time cyclists wait at a traffic light is to be limited to 30 seconds.
Bicycle theft is rampant in Amsterdam (legendary, one might even say). Some 75,000 bikes are stolen every year. The situation has improved some in recent years following police campaigns against theft. Most people do not report a stolen bike, and they are being encouraged to do so, as this is thought to help police to identify problem areas. More guarded bike parking lots are also planned. A second multi-story bike parking lot is planned for Central Station.
"100 Miljoen euro voor Amsterdamse fietsers"
A Grand a DayAn average of 1,000 new vehicles a day appeared on Beijing's streets in 2004. The number of cars rose almost 20% in 2005. The city's answer: more roads. Time for Beijing to think again.
Picked up by World Carfree News from
Ban Car Ads?In an opinion piece published in the San Francisco Chronicle, Bob Ecker said:
[O]ur country's obsessive consumption of oil to fill the tanks of our auto-centric culture may eventually kill off the world, and believe it or not, Mr. and Mrs. America, you and I will go down, too. Our love affair with cars has to change, sooner rather than later. The hubris of excess (see Hummer) has gotten our society into a pickle, and it's time to take a novel approach with this problem.Ironically, Ecker is president of Bay Area Travel Writers.
"Coming to Terms With Our Obsessions:
Time to ban car commercials?"
Progress on the Ballot in TucsonJack Foster reports from Tucson, Arizona, that a 20-year Regional Transportation Plan will be on the ballot this May and that it may well pass. He reports that public transport is now very poor. Some highlights of the plan:
In short, it's a great plan that will make a huge difference in our community, and this time (for a change), people like me and Carolyn Campbell are on the same side as people like SAHBA (Southern Arizona Builders Association) and Jim Click (a major car sales figure). The Pima County Democratic Party has endorsed the plan, as has the Alliance of Retired Americans, the Blenman Elm Neighborhood Association Board, and the Sonoran Institute. The breadth and diversity of support reflects the breadth and diversity of our community.It's encouraging to see Americans finally waking up from their auto-centric nightmare.
Special to Carfree Times
Bogotá Holds Real Carfree DayMore than a million private cars were kept off the streets of Bogotá in observance of the city's carfree day. In contrast to European cities, which normally hold token carfree day events, the capital of Colombia was nearly carfree for a day. In the future, cars may be forbidden to enter downtown at all.
Alternative means of transport are being promoted. Vehicular sources account for 70% of the city's air pollution, and strong measures will be taken to limit air pollution from city buses. The city already has an extensive network of bike paths, implemented a decade ago. The Transmilenio BRT system has been in operation since 2001.
It's time for Europe and America to catch up with Colombia.
"Residents leave cars at home"
Greenland Slipping AwayGreenland's glaciers are lurching towards the sea much faster than expected. It had been thought that the entire Greenland ice sheet could melt in a thousand years. New evidence suggests it could happen much faster. The amount of ice dumped into the Atlantic Ocean from Greenland has doubled in five years. If the Greenland ice sheet melted completely, it would raise global sea levels by about 7 meters (23 feet).
Greenland's contribution to rising sea levels is two to three times greater than it was in 1996. Higher air temperatures seem to be the cause of increased glacier movement in the southern half of Greenland since 1996. Air temperature in south-east Greenland has risen by 3C in the past 20 years. It is feared that the northward spread of warmer air may have caused a rapid increase in glacier speed further north after 2000.
The direct mechanism appears to be lubrication of the ice-rock interface by melt-water. The study was reported in the prestigious and usually reliable journal Science.
"Greenland ice swells ocean rise"
Plankton Die-Off PredictedGlobal warming may destroy plankton, the basis of all marine life. Warmer seas will interfere with the upward transport of vital nutrients from the abyss, starving plankton, with catastrophic results. Warmer surface water will increase stratification and reduce mixing.
Plankton is one of the primary mechanisms for absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere, so a plankton die-off would further exacerbate global warming, to say nothing of the effects on marine life.
Scientists had believed phytoplankton, which lives at depths of about 100 meters, was stable and unaffected by global warming. "This model prediction was rather unexpected," said one scientist.
"Warmer Seas Will Wipe Out Plankton, Source of Ocean Life"
Honking the Fuel-Cell Horn, PrematurelyINS Net recently carried an article touting the great success of the latest fuel cell unit for powering residences. The fuel cell achieves a claimed 81.2% total efficiency. There are only a couple of problems:
"Home Fuel Cell Achieves 81.2% Total Energy Efficiency"
Mythanol? Bio-Doggle?The conversion of such crops as corn, soybeans, and sunflowers into oil and ethanol for use as a motor fuel appears to consume much more energy than is available in the resulting ethanol or bio-diesel, according to a new study. (This concern was voiced at least ten years ago in Scientific American.)
"There is just no energy benefit to using plant biomass for liquid fuel," says David Pimentel, one of the study authors. "These strategies are not sustainable." A detailed analysis of the energy input-yield ratios of producing ethanol from corn, switch grass, and wood biomass as well as for producing bio-diesel from soybean and sunflower plants was published in Natural Resources Research.
For ethanol production, the study found:
The researchers incorporated into their calculations such factors as the energy used in producing the crop (including pesticides and fertilizer, fuel for farm machinery and irrigation, grinding, and transport) and in fermenting/distilling the ethanol.
Additional costs are incurred, such as federal and state subsidies that are passed on to consumers and the costs associated with environmental pollution or degradation, but these figures were not included in the analysis. Pimentel said, "The United State desperately needs a liquid fuel replacement for oil in the near future, but producing ethanol or bio-diesel from plant biomass is going down the wrong road, because you use more energy to produce these fuels than you get out from the combustion of these products."
Pimentel does advocate the burning of biomass to release energy to heat houses and so forth but thinks that the use of biomass to produce liquid fuels is a big mistake. "The government spends more than $3 billion a year to subsidize ethanol production when it does not provide a net energy balance or gain, is not a renewable energy source or an economical fuel. Further, its production and use contribute to air, water, and soil pollution and global warming."
Pimentel says the USA should focus on producing electricity from photovoltaic cells, wind power, and burning biomass. He is reputed to advocate "producing fuel from hydrogen conversion." I am not clear what this entails or which process might be used. If he refers to the production of hydrogen, the usual method is hydrolysis of water, which consumes electricity with an energy value considerably greater than that of the hydrogen produced.
Brazil has a fairly long history of producing ethanol from bagasse, the residue from crushing sugar cane. It may well be that in certain limited circumstances, ethanol production from farm waste makes sense, but this is no panacea, and in most cases, it only makes matters worse.
"Ethanol And Bio-diesel From Crops Not Worth The Energy"
GM OilBiologist J. Craig Venter proposes to create a designer microbe with genetic material harvested from the sea. This microbe, if successful, would turn crops like switch grass and cornstalks more or less directly into ethanol. Other designer microbes might produce hydrogen.
Venter hired Aristides Patrinos, former director of the US Energy Department's biological and environmental research program. Patrinos is behind some of Bush's recent energy proposals but is also the man who led the Human Genome Project, which competed with Venter in the race to decode human DNA.
The problem with current ethanol production methods is that they are multi-stage (if not particularly complex) techniques, which raises their cost. Patrinos thinks costs can be reduced by using a microbe soup to perform in one step all of the biological functions needed to convert plant material into ethanol. (It even appears that he hopes to perform a distillation in-situ, which sounds rather improbable to me, since alcohol at fuel concentrations is a powerful sterilizing agent.)
Venter and Patrinos are at least aware of the concern that bio-fuels might compete with food for cropland. Unfortunately, the Washington Post article that is the source of this snippet concentrates more on the business aspects of the technology than the technical aspects. No mention is made of the questions regarding net energy gain discussed in the article above.
Although I do believe that bio-technology may have remarkable potential, we must ask just how far we want to pursue this. Is bio-tech fuel really going to improve the total picture? What unanticipated, adverse effects might we encounter? Do we really have any idea what we're getting into? Bitter experience would suggest that the answer is all too likely to be, "no."
"J. Craig Venter's Next Little Thing:
Peak-Oil in Mexico?Mexico’s Pemex has announced that the super-giant Cantarell field is peaking. An 8 December 2005 press release from Pemex confirmed that Cantarell has peaked and that production will decline from this point forward. The decline will be surprisingly sharp, with output falling in 2008 to 70% of 2005 production. This, the world's third largest field, produced a little over 2 MBD in 2005, so this is an appreciable loss. Even to achieve the forecast production will require large investments.
"Mexico’s Pemex Press Release"
Oil-Free SwedenSweden plans to end its reliance on oil within 15 years and to do this without building more nuclear power plants. The plan was developed by a committee with a broad base of industrialists, academics, car manufacturers, and farmers. The nation, hard hit by the oil price shocks of the 1970s, fears the economic effects of rising oil prices following peak oil. Apparently the plan will propose extensive use of Sweden's forests to supply energy in place of oil. Wind and wave energy will also play a role in a plan to be presented soon to parliament.
"Sweden aims for oil-free economy"
Americans Might Support Higher Gas TaxesAmericans oppose higher federal gasoline taxes, but many would agree to an increase if the money went to tackle global warming or reductions in the huge US appetite for foreign oil, according to a New York Times/CBS poll. The leaders of both political parties won't touch the idea.
Some 55% of those polled would support an increase if it reduced dependence on foreign oil; the number rises to 59% if the reduced fuel consumption and global warming were to result. People won't support this unless the tax is earmarked for specific projects. Increased fuel taxes would hit the working poor hardest, and some have proposed to lower income taxes in this group to offset higher fuel taxes.
"Americans Are Cautiously Open to Gas Tax Rise, Poll Shows"
This book was received right at press time, and I have not had time to do more the rifle through it. If the (endless) sub-title interests you, you are likely to profit from this book. It seems clear and accessible, and it carries extensive notes, bibliography, and an index.
Hot New Links
The links below will open in a new browser window:
[PDF! 16MB download!]
"The Benefits of High Density Development" [PDF!] (Brookings Institution)
"Parking Management Best Practices"[PDF!] Promotional Flyer
About Carfree Times
Next IssueThe next issue of Carfree Times is scheduled for June 2006.
Subscribe to Carfree Times
Carfree Times is published quarterly at Carfree.com. To receive e-mail notices of new issues, please visit the subscription page or send e-mail with the word "Subscribe" in the subject line. We do not share our mailing list.
Write for Carfree TimesInterested in writing for Carfree Times? We welcome articles on a wide variety of subjects, and offer an opportunity to publish letters to the editor and guest editorials. Drop us an e-mail.
Back to Carfree.com
Carfree Times Home
Back to Carfree Times Issue 41
Forward to Carfree Times Issue 43
About the book: Carfree Cities
Copyright ©2006 J.Crawford